Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Design Wizard | PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Create, track, and eSign sales proposals & contracts inside HubSpot.
| Metric | Design Wizard | PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 304 |
| Active installs | 55+ | 18,134+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | ★ Free plan available | From $65/mo |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 3 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed since | Jul 2017 | Sep 2015 |
Based on the data on this page, PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments is the stronger choice for most HubSpot App Marketplace teams — 4.3★ vs Design Wizard's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Design Wizard offers a free tier (Free plan available) while PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments starts at From $65/mo. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments has the larger user base (304 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Design Wizard's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Design Wizard's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Design Wizard audit • PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments audit
Design Wizard is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments starts at From $65/mo. Both publish their pricing on the HubSpot App Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments does carry the larger published review base (304 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments has the deeper published review base (304 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Design Wizard typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (304 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Design Wizard and PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Design Wizard" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
