| Dedupely | Tiyora - WhatsApp Integration | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | |
| Description | — | |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Using WhatsApp on the phone? Sync even while being away from your desk
| Metric | Dedupely | Tiyora - WhatsApp Integration |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 224 | 35 |
| Active installs | 3,984+ | 341+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $40/mo | From $69/mo |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 5 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed since | Dec 2018 | Sep 2019 |
Based on the data on this page, Dedupely is the stronger choice for most HubSpot App Marketplace teams — 4.9★ vs Tiyora - WhatsApp Integration's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing is noticeably different: Dedupely at From $40/mo vs Tiyora - WhatsApp Integration at From $69/mo (~73% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage teams the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market teams should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified.
Dedupely has the larger user base (224 reviews vs 35), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Tiyora - WhatsApp Integration's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Dedupely; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Tiyora - WhatsApp Integration's 35-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Dedupely's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Dedupely audit • Tiyora - WhatsApp Integration audit
No description available.
Both Dedupely and Tiyora - WhatsApp Integration offer paid plans only. Dedupely starts at From $40/mo; Tiyora - WhatsApp Integration starts at From $69/mo. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Dedupely has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 224 reviews) compared to Tiyora - WhatsApp Integration (4.0★ from 35 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Dedupely holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Dedupely has the deeper published review base (224 vs 35), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Dedupely typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (224 reviews). Tiyora - WhatsApp Integration typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (35 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Dedupely and Tiyora - WhatsApp Integration both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Tiyora - WhatsApp Integration" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.