| Dedupely | Heymarket SMS, RCS & | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | |
| Description | — | |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Dedupely | Heymarket SMS, RCS & Email for HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 225 | 24 |
| Active installs | 3,957+ | 541+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $40/mo | ★ From $24/mo |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 5 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed since | Dec 2018 | Apr 2020 |
Dedupely edges out Heymarket SMS, RCS & Email for HubSpot on rating (4.9★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing is noticeably different: Heymarket SMS, RCS & Email for HubSpot at From $24/mo vs Dedupely at From $40/mo (~67% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage teams the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market teams should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified.
Dedupely has the larger user base (225 reviews vs 24), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Heymarket SMS, RCS & Email for HubSpot's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Dedupely; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Heymarket SMS, RCS & Email for HubSpot's 24-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Dedupely's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Dedupely audit • Heymarket SMS, RCS & Email for HubSpot audit
No tracked changes.
No description available.
Both Dedupely and Heymarket SMS, RCS & Email for HubSpot offer paid plans only. Dedupely starts at From $40/mo; Heymarket SMS, RCS & Email for HubSpot starts at From $24/mo. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Dedupely has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 225 reviews) compared to Heymarket SMS, RCS & Email for HubSpot (4.7★ from 24 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Dedupely holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Dedupely has the deeper published review base (225 vs 24), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Dedupely typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (225 reviews). Heymarket SMS, RCS & Email for HubSpot typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (24 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Dedupely and Heymarket SMS, RCS & Email for HubSpot both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Heymarket SMS, RCS & Email for HubSpot" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
