Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Databox Inc. | Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Databox Inc. | Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 ★ | ★ 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 58 | ★ 231 |
| Active installs | 15,539+ | 3,070+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | ★ Free plan available | From $25/mo |
| Pricing tiers | 5 tiers | 5 tiers |
| Listed since | Jan 2017 | Mar 2018 |
Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling edges out Databox Inc. on rating (4.5★ vs 4.3★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Databox Inc. offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling starts at From $25/mo. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling has the larger user base (231 reviews vs 58), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Databox Inc.'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Databox Inc.'s 58-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Databox Inc. audit • Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling audit
No tracked changes.
Databox Inc. is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling starts at From $25/mo. Both publish their pricing on the HubSpot App Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 231 reviews) compared to Databox Inc. (4.3★ from 58 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling has the deeper published review base (231 vs 58), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Databox Inc. typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (58 reviews). Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (231 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Databox Inc. and Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Databox Inc." in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
