| Clay | Aircall | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Clay | Aircall : AI-powered calling and SMS |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 ★ | ★ 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 17 | ★ 321 |
| Active installs | 12,319+ | 15,845+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $800/mo | ★ From $40/mo |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 2 tiers |
| Listed since | Aug 2025 | Oct 2016 |
Based on the data on this page, Aircall : AI-powered calling and SMS is the stronger choice for most HubSpot App Marketplace teams — 4.3★ vs Clay's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing differs significantly: Aircall : AI-powered calling and SMS at From $40/mo vs Clay at From $800/mo (Clay is roughly 20.0x the entry-tier cost of Aircall : AI-powered calling and SMS). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor.
Aircall : AI-powered calling and SMS has the larger user base (321 reviews vs 17), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Clay's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Aircall : AI-powered calling and SMS; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Clay's 17-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Aircall : AI-powered calling and SMS's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Clay audit • Aircall : AI-powered calling and SMS audit
No tracked changes.
Both Clay and Aircall : AI-powered calling and SMS offer paid plans only. Clay starts at From $800/mo; Aircall : AI-powered calling and SMS starts at From $40/mo. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Aircall : AI-powered calling and SMS has the higher average rating (4.3★ from 321 reviews) compared to Clay (3.8★ from 17 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Aircall : AI-powered calling and SMS holds the higher average rating (4.3★ vs 3.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Aircall : AI-powered calling and SMS has the deeper published review base (321 vs 17), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Clay typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (17 reviews). Aircall : AI-powered calling and SMS typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (321 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Clay and Aircall : AI-powered calling and SMS both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Clay" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.