Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Clone Attack | Gmail | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | |
| Description | — | |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Clone Attack | Gmail |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.7 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 63 | ★ 3.4k |
| Active installs | 1,118+ | 534,442+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed since | Oct 2020 | Mar 2014 |
Based on the data on this page, Clone Attack is the stronger choice for most HubSpot App Marketplace teams — 4.7★ vs Gmail's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Clone Attack at Free plan available, Gmail at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Gmail has the larger user base (3,417 reviews vs 63), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Clone Attack's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Clone Attack; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Gmail's 3,417-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Clone Attack's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Clone Attack audit • Gmail audit
No description available.
Both Clone Attack and Gmail offer paid plans only. Clone Attack starts at Free plan available; Gmail starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Clone Attack has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 63 reviews) compared to Gmail (4.0★ from 3,417 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Clone Attack holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Gmail has the deeper published review base (3,417 vs 63), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Clone Attack typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (63 reviews). Gmail typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3,417 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Clone Attack and Gmail both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Clone Attack" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
