Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Create truly impressive, interactive proposals from HubSpot in a couple of clicks
| Fathom AI Notetaker | Qwilr Proposal Software | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Automatically sync AI meeting summaries, action items, and insights to HubSpot.
| Metric | Fathom AI Notetaker | Qwilr Proposal Software |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.7 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 457 | 56 |
| Active installs | 21,212+ | 3,000+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | ★ Free plan available | From $49/mo |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed since | Sep 2021 | Nov 2017 |
Based on the data on this page, Fathom AI Notetaker is the stronger choice for most HubSpot App Marketplace teams — 4.7★ vs Qwilr Proposal Software's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Fathom AI Notetaker offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Qwilr Proposal Software starts at From $49/mo. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Fathom AI Notetaker has the larger user base (457 reviews vs 56), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Qwilr Proposal Software's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Fathom AI Notetaker; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Qwilr Proposal Software's 56-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Fathom AI Notetaker's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Fathom AI Notetaker audit • Qwilr Proposal Software audit
No tracked changes.
Fathom AI Notetaker is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Qwilr Proposal Software starts at From $49/mo. Both publish their pricing on the HubSpot App Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Fathom AI Notetaker has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 457 reviews) compared to Qwilr Proposal Software (4.0★ from 56 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Fathom AI Notetaker holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Fathom AI Notetaker has the deeper published review base (457 vs 56), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Fathom AI Notetaker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (457 reviews). Qwilr Proposal Software typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (56 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Fathom AI Notetaker and Qwilr Proposal Software both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Qwilr Proposal Software" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.