Fathom AI Notetaker vs Pixel Compress

Fathom AI Notetaker edges out Pixel Compress on rating (4.7★ vs 4.5★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing entry tiers: Fathom AI Notetaker at Free plan available, Pixel Compress at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Fathom AI Notetaker has the larger user base (457 reviews vs 15), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Pixel Compress's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Fathom AI Notetaker; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Pixel Compress's 15-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Fathom AI Notetaker's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Fathom AI Notetaker or Pixel Compress cheaper?

Both Fathom AI Notetaker and Pixel Compress offer paid plans only. Fathom AI Notetaker starts at Free plan available; Pixel Compress starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Fathom AI Notetaker or Pixel Compress?

Fathom AI Notetaker has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 457 reviews) compared to Pixel Compress (4.5★ from 15 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Fathom AI Notetaker or Pixel Compress?

Fathom AI Notetaker holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Fathom AI Notetaker or Pixel Compress?

Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Fathom AI Notetaker has the deeper published review base (457 vs 15), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large HubSpot App Marketplace teams?

Fathom AI Notetaker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (457 reviews). Pixel Compress typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (15 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Fathom AI Notetaker and Pixel Compress?

Migration support varies by app and category. Fathom AI Notetaker and Pixel Compress both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Pixel Compress" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.