Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Table of contents | ZIP Extractor | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Open ZIP, RAR, 7z, TAR, and password-protected archives from Google Drive™, Gmail™, or your computer. Fully private: ZIP file processing is done in your browser, not on our servers.
| Metric | Table of contents | ZIP Extractor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.4 ★ | ★ 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3.1k | ★ 16k |
| Active installs | 4,244,665+ | 65,225,981+ |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Not available | Free of charge |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Featured placements | — | 1 |
Based on the data on this page, ZIP Extractor is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace merchants — 4.3★ vs Table of contents's 3.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, ZIP Extractor offers a free tier (Free of charge) while Table of contents starts at Not available. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. ZIP Extractor has the larger user base (16,449 reviews vs 3,104), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Table of contents's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to ZIP Extractor; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Table of contents's 3,104-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ZIP Extractor's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Table of contents audit • ZIP Extractor audit
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
ZIP Extractor is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge). Table of contents starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
ZIP Extractor has the higher average rating (4.3★ from 16,449 reviews) compared to Table of contents (3.4★ from 3,104 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Table of contents fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; ZIP Extractor is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace. ZIP Extractor has more onboarding documentation maturity (16,449 reviews vs 3,104), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Table of contents typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (3,104 reviews). ZIP Extractor aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (16,449 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Table of contents and ZIP Extractor both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Table of contents" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
