Loading content…
Sheet2Site vs Skolsynk
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Sheet2Site | Skolsynk | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Sheet2Site | Skolsynk | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Sheet2Site | Skolsynk |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 92 | 2 |
| Active installs | 103,562+ | 712,243+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Not available | Not available |
Skolsynk edges out Sheet2Site on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Sheet2Site at Not available, Skolsynk at Not available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Skolsynk; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Sheet2Site's 92-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Skolsynk's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Sheet2Site audit • Skolsynk audit
Both Sheet2Site and Skolsynk offer paid plans only. Sheet2Site starts at Not available; Skolsynk starts at Not available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Skolsynk has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Sheet2Site (4.8★ from 92 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Skolsynk holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Sheet2Site has the deeper published review base (92 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Sheet2Site typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (92 reviews). Skolsynk typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Sheet2Site and Skolsynk both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Skolsynk" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.