Record Meeting for Google Meet™ vs Worklytics

Record Meeting for Google Meet™ and Worklytics are evenly matched on rating (4.7★ vs 4.7★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

On pricing, Record Meeting for Google Meet™ offers a free tier (Free of charge with paid features) while Worklytics starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.

Record Meeting for Google Meet™ has the larger user base (323 reviews vs 7), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Worklytics's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Record Meeting for Google Meet™ or Worklytics cheaper?

Record Meeting for Google Meet™ is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge with paid features). Worklytics starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Record Meeting for Google Meet™ or Worklytics?

Record Meeting for Google Meet™ (4.7★, 323 reviews) and Worklytics (4.7★, 7 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose Record Meeting for Google Meet™ or Worklytics?

Worklytics holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Record Meeting for Google Meet™ or Worklytics?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Record Meeting for Google Meet™ has the deeper published review base (323 vs 7), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Google Workspace Marketplace admins?

Record Meeting for Google Meet™ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (323 reviews). Worklytics typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (7 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Record Meeting for Google Meet™ and Worklytics?

Migration support varies by app and category. Record Meeting for Google Meet™ and Worklytics both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Worklytics" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.