Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Record, transcribe & summarize your Google Meet™ calls with AI. Get instant meeting notes, action items & AI summaries from every meeting you record.
| Record Meeting, Note Taker & Transcriber – tl;dv | Zoom for Google Workspace™ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Use Zoom to easily schedule, join, manage, and customize meetings from Gmail and Google Calendar.
| Metric | Record Meeting, Note Taker & Transcriber – tl;dv | Zoom for Google Workspace™ |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.7 ★ | 4.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | 518 | ★ 8k |
| Active installs | 610,465+ | 60,031,684+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge | Free of charge |
Record Meeting, Note Taker & Transcriber – tl;dv edges out Zoom for Google Workspace™ on rating (4.7★ vs 4.4★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Record Meeting, Note Taker & Transcriber – tl;dv at Free of charge, Zoom for Google Workspace™ at Free of charge. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Zoom for Google Workspace™ has the larger user base (8,045 reviews vs 518), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Record Meeting, Note Taker & Transcriber – tl;dv's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Record Meeting, Note Taker & Transcriber – tl;dv; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Zoom for Google Workspace™'s 8,045-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Record Meeting, Note Taker & Transcriber – tl;dv's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Record Meeting, Note Taker & Transcriber – tl;dv audit • Zoom for Google Workspace™ audit
No tracked changes.
Both Record Meeting, Note Taker & Transcriber – tl;dv and Zoom for Google Workspace™ offer paid plans only. Record Meeting, Note Taker & Transcriber – tl;dv starts at Free of charge; Zoom for Google Workspace™ starts at Free of charge. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Record Meeting, Note Taker & Transcriber – tl;dv has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 518 reviews) compared to Zoom for Google Workspace™ (4.4★ from 8,045 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Record Meeting, Note Taker & Transcriber – tl;dv holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Zoom for Google Workspace™ has the deeper published review base (8,045 vs 518), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Record Meeting, Note Taker & Transcriber – tl;dv typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (518 reviews). Zoom for Google Workspace™ typically suits established teams with steady usage based on its published review base (8,045 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Record Meeting, Note Taker & Transcriber – tl;dv and Zoom for Google Workspace™ both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Record Meeting, Note Taker & Transcriber – tl;dv" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.