Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Bring mapping capabilities and geocoding to Google Sheets: now with new places search, administrative boundaries, GeoJSON and KML download.
| Maps for Sheets | ZIP Extractor | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Open ZIP, RAR, 7z, TAR, and password-protected archives from Google Drive™, Gmail™, or your computer. Fully private: ZIP file processing is done in your browser, not on our servers.
| Metric | Maps for Sheets | ZIP Extractor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.5 ★ | ★ 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 60 | ★ 16k |
| Active installs | 1,114,182+ | 65,225,981+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge with paid features | Free of charge |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Featured placements | — | 1 |
Based on the data on this page, ZIP Extractor is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace merchants — 4.3★ vs Maps for Sheets's 3.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Maps for Sheets at Free of charge with paid features, ZIP Extractor at Free of charge. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. ZIP Extractor has the larger user base (16,449 reviews vs 60), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Maps for Sheets's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to ZIP Extractor; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Maps for Sheets's 60-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ZIP Extractor's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Maps for Sheets audit • ZIP Extractor audit
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
Both Maps for Sheets and ZIP Extractor offer paid plans only. Maps for Sheets starts at Free of charge with paid features; ZIP Extractor starts at Free of charge. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
ZIP Extractor has the higher average rating (4.3★ from 16,449 reviews) compared to Maps for Sheets (3.5★ from 60 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Maps for Sheets fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; ZIP Extractor is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace. ZIP Extractor has more onboarding documentation maturity (16,449 reviews vs 60), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Maps for Sheets typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (60 reviews). ZIP Extractor aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (16,449 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Maps for Sheets and ZIP Extractor both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Maps for Sheets" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
