Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
AI agent for Google Sheets™. Automate formulas, formatting, cleanup, enrichment, analysis, bulk content generation and translation from a single prompt.
| GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ | Screen Record | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ | Screen Record |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 3.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 4.1k | 134 |
| Active installs | 7,311,426+ | 1,520,882+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge trial | Free of charge |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Featured placements | 1 | — |
Based on the data on this page, GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace merchants — 4.8★ vs Screen Record's 3.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ at Free of charge trial, Screen Record at Free of charge. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ has the larger user base (4,088 reviews vs 134), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Screen Record's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Screen Record's 134-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™'s broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ audit • Screen Record audit
| Keyword | GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ | Screen Record |
|---|---|---|
| ai agent | #9 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
Both GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ and Screen Record offer paid plans only. GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ starts at Free of charge trial; Screen Record starts at Free of charge. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 4,088 reviews) compared to Screen Record (3.2★ from 134 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Screen Record is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace. GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ has more onboarding documentation maturity (4,088 reviews vs 134), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (4,088 reviews). Screen Record aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (134 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ and Screen Record both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Screen Record" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
