Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
AI agent for Google Sheets™. Automate formulas, formatting, cleanup, enrichment, analysis, bulk content generation and translation from a single prompt.
| GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ | Report Suspicious | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Proofpoint ZenGuide Report Suspicious (formerly PhishAlarm) allows users to alert security and incident response teams to suspected phishing emails.
| Metric | GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ | Report Suspicious |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 4.1k | 205 |
| Active installs | 7,306,314+ | 6,328,648+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free of charge trial | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Featured placements | 1 | — |
Based on the data on this page, GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace merchants — 4.8★ vs Report Suspicious's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ offers a free tier (Free of charge trial) while Report Suspicious starts at Paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ has the larger user base (4,089 reviews vs 205), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Report Suspicious's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Report Suspicious's 205-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™'s broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ audit • Report Suspicious audit
| Keyword | GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ | Report Suspicious |
|---|---|---|
| ai agent | #9 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge trial). Report Suspicious starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 4,089 reviews) compared to Report Suspicious (4.1★ from 205 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Report Suspicious is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace. GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ has more onboarding documentation maturity (4,089 reviews vs 205), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (4,089 reviews). Report Suspicious aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (205 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. GPT for Sheets™ and Docs™ and Report Suspicious both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Report Suspicious" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
