Gopher for Groups vs Table of contents

Based on the data on this page, Gopher for Groups is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 5.0★ vs Table of contents's 3.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Gopher for Groups at Not available, Table of contents at Not available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Table of contents has the larger user base (3,113 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Gopher for Groups's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Gopher for Groups; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Table of contents's 3,113-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Gopher for Groups's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Gopher for Groups or Table of contents cheaper?

Both Gopher for Groups and Table of contents offer paid plans only. Gopher for Groups starts at Not available; Table of contents starts at Not available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Gopher for Groups or Table of contents?

Gopher for Groups has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Table of contents (3.4★ from 3,113 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Gopher for Groups or Table of contents?

Gopher for Groups holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Gopher for Groups or Table of contents?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Table of contents has the deeper published review base (3,113 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Google Workspace Marketplace admins?

Gopher for Groups typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). Table of contents typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3,113 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Gopher for Groups and Table of contents?

Migration support varies by app and category. Gopher for Groups and Table of contents both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Gopher for Groups" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.