Gopher for Groups vs Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector

Based on the data on this page, Gopher for Groups is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 5.0★ vs Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector offers a free tier (Free of charge) while Gopher for Groups starts at Not available. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector has the larger user base (197 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Gopher for Groups's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Gopher for Groups; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector's 197-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Gopher for Groups's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Gopher for Groups or Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector cheaper?

Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge). Gopher for Groups starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Gopher for Groups or Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector?

Gopher for Groups has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector (3.8★ from 197 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Gopher for Groups or Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector?

Gopher for Groups holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Gopher for Groups or Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector has the deeper published review base (197 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Google Workspace Marketplace admins?

Gopher for Groups typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (197 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.