Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Dig into your Google Groups settings and root out the hidden risks. Adds Google Groups administrative mojo to any Google Sheet.
| Gopher for Groups | Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Pear Deck helps teachers transform Google Slides into powerful formative assessments and active learning experiences for every student, every day.
| Metric | Gopher for Groups | Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 1.9k |
| Active installs | 672,035+ | 80,511,081+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Not available | Not available |
Based on the data on this page, Gopher for Groups is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 5.0★ vs Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Gopher for Groups at Not available, Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on at Not available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on has the larger user base (1,931 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Gopher for Groups's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Gopher for Groups; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on's 1,931-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Gopher for Groups's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Gopher for Groups audit • Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on audit
| Keyword | Gopher for Groups | Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on |
|---|---|---|
| chatbots | Not ranked | #20 |
| project | Not ranked | #23 |
Both Gopher for Groups and Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on offer paid plans only. Gopher for Groups starts at Not available; Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on starts at Not available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Gopher for Groups has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on (4.3★ from 1,931 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Gopher for Groups holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on has the deeper published review base (1,931 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Gopher for Groups typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,931 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Gopher for Groups and Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Gopher for Groups" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
