Open ZIP, RAR, 7z, TAR, and password-protected archives from Google Drive™, Gmail™, or your computer. Fully private: ZIP file processing is done in your browser, not on our servers.
| Metric | Google Drive | ZIP Extractor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 368 | ★ 16k |
| Active installs | 4,142,157+ | 65,225,981+ |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Not available | Free of charge |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Featured placements | 1 | 1 |
Google Drive edges out ZIP Extractor on rating (4.5★ vs 4.3★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. On pricing, ZIP Extractor offers a free tier (Free of charge) while Google Drive starts at Not available. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. ZIP Extractor has the larger user base (16,449 reviews vs 368), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Google Drive's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Google Drive; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ZIP Extractor's 16,449-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Google Drive's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Google Drive audit • ZIP Extractor audit
No tracked changes.
ZIP Extractor is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge). Google Drive starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Google Drive has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 368 reviews) compared to ZIP Extractor (4.3★ from 16,449 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Google Drive fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; ZIP Extractor is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace. ZIP Extractor has more onboarding documentation maturity (16,449 reviews vs 368), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Google Drive typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (368 reviews). ZIP Extractor aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (16,449 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Google Drive and ZIP Extractor both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Google Drive" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.