Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
A powerful mail merge and mass email system for Gmail™.
| GMass for Gmail™ | ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Manage, comment and share contacts directly from Calendar to keep your team organized
| Metric | GMass for Gmail™ | ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 6.8k | 2.2k |
| Active installs | 1,173,205+ | 250,540+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge with paid features | Free of charge trial |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Featured placements | 2 | — |
ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar edges out GMass for Gmail™ on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: GMass for Gmail™ at Free of charge with paid features, ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar at Free of charge trial. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. GMass for Gmail™ has the larger user base (6,758 reviews vs 2,215), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — GMass for Gmail™'s 6,758-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: GMass for Gmail™ audit • ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar audit
| Keyword | GMass for Gmail™ | ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar |
|---|---|---|
| chatbots | Not ranked | #45 |
| project | Not ranked | #47 |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
Both GMass for Gmail™ and ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar offer paid plans only. GMass for Gmail™ starts at Free of charge with paid features; ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar starts at Free of charge trial. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2,215 reviews) compared to GMass for Gmail™ (4.8★ from 6,758 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. GMass for Gmail™ fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace. GMass for Gmail™ has more onboarding documentation maturity (6,758 reviews vs 2,215), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
GMass for Gmail™ typically suits established stores with steady traffic based on its review-base composition (6,758 reviews). ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (2,215 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. GMass for Gmail™ and ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.