Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
A powerful mail merge and mass email system for Gmail™.
| GMass for Gmail™ | OpenSolver | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Solve linear and mixed-integer optimization problems in Google Sheets with no artificial limits on problem size.
| Metric | GMass for Gmail™ | OpenSolver |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 2.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 6.8k | 316 |
| Active installs | 1,212,112+ | 619,175+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free of charge with paid features | Not available |
Based on the data on this page, GMass for Gmail™ is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 4.8★ vs OpenSolver's 2.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, GMass for Gmail™ offers a free tier (Free of charge with paid features) while OpenSolver starts at Not available. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
GMass for Gmail™ has the larger user base (6,790 reviews vs 316), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. OpenSolver's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to GMass for Gmail™; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — OpenSolver's 316-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than GMass for Gmail™'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: GMass for Gmail™ audit • OpenSolver audit
GMass for Gmail™ is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge with paid features). OpenSolver starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
GMass for Gmail™ has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 6,790 reviews) compared to OpenSolver (2.5★ from 316 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
GMass for Gmail™ holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 2.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. GMass for Gmail™ has the deeper published review base (6,790 vs 316), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
GMass for Gmail™ typically suits established teams with steady usage based on its published review base (6,790 reviews). OpenSolver typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (316 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. GMass for Gmail™ and OpenSolver both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from OpenSolver" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.