Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Enhance code management by taking Github actions directly in Gemini Apps
| GitHub Integration | ShiftEdit | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | GitHub Integration | ShiftEdit |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | ★ 4.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | 4 | ★ 1.5k |
| Active installs | 1,786,038+ | 991,856+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free of charge | Not available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
ShiftEdit edges out GitHub Integration on rating (4.2★ vs 4.0★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. On pricing, GitHub Integration offers a free tier (Free of charge) while ShiftEdit starts at Not available. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. ShiftEdit has the larger user base (1,489 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. GitHub Integration's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to ShiftEdit; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — GitHub Integration's 4-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ShiftEdit's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: GitHub Integration audit • ShiftEdit audit
GitHub Integration is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge). ShiftEdit starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
ShiftEdit has the higher average rating (4.2★ from 1,489 reviews) compared to GitHub Integration (4.0★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. GitHub Integration fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; ShiftEdit is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace. ShiftEdit has more onboarding documentation maturity (1,489 reviews vs 4), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
GitHub Integration typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (4 reviews). ShiftEdit aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (1,489 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. GitHub Integration and ShiftEdit both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from GitHub Integration" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
