Smart Certificates vs Gestion en masa

Gestion en masa and Smart Certificates are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

Pricing entry tiers: Gestion en masa at Free of charge trial, Smart Certificates at Free of charge with paid features. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Smart Certificates has the larger user base (177 reviews vs 8), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Gestion en masa's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Gestion en masa or Smart Certificates cheaper?

Both Gestion en masa and Smart Certificates offer paid plans only. Gestion en masa starts at Free of charge trial; Smart Certificates starts at Free of charge with paid features. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Gestion en masa or Smart Certificates?

Gestion en masa (5.0★, 8 reviews) and Smart Certificates (4.9★, 177 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose Gestion en masa or Smart Certificates?

Gestion en masa holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Gestion en masa or Smart Certificates?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Smart Certificates has the deeper published review base (177 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Google Workspace Marketplace admins?

Gestion en masa typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). Smart Certificates typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (177 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Gestion en masa and Smart Certificates?

Migration support varies by app and category. Gestion en masa and Smart Certificates both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Gestion en masa" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.