Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Plagium detects plagiarism, content reuse, and AI/GPT generated text to ensure text originality.
| Gestion en masa | Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Its main functions are to facilitate the registration, modification, adhesion to groups and the elimination of users. Also the creation of shared folders,all in a massive, fast and easy way.
| Metric | Gestion en masa | Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 8 | ★ 197 |
| Active installs | 508,367+ | 4,019,302+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge trial | Free of charge |
Based on the data on this page, Gestion en masa is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 5.0★ vs Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Gestion en masa at Free of charge trial, Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector at Free of charge. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector has the larger user base (197 reviews vs 8), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Gestion en masa's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Gestion en masa; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector's 197-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Gestion en masa's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Gestion en masa audit • Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector audit
Both Gestion en masa and Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector offer paid plans only. Gestion en masa starts at Free of charge trial; Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector starts at Free of charge. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Gestion en masa has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 8 reviews) compared to Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector (3.8★ from 197 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Gestion en masa holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector has the deeper published review base (197 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Gestion en masa typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (197 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Gestion en masa and Plagium - plagiarism checker & GPT detector both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Gestion en masa" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
