Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Easy geocoding addresses. Translate your street names into GPS coordinates, fast easy and powerful thanks to Google Maps
| Geocoding by SmartMonkey | ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Manage, comment and share contacts directly from Calendar to keep your team organized
| Metric | Geocoding by SmartMonkey | ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 36 | ★ 2.2k |
| Active installs | 388,296+ | 250,540+ |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Not available | Free of charge trial |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs Geocoding by SmartMonkey's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar offers a free tier (Free of charge trial) while Geocoding by SmartMonkey starts at Not available. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar has the larger user base (2,215 reviews vs 36), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Geocoding by SmartMonkey's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Geocoding by SmartMonkey's 36-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Geocoding by SmartMonkey audit • ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar audit
| Keyword | Geocoding by SmartMonkey | ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar |
|---|---|---|
| chatbots | Not ranked | #45 |
| project | Not ranked | #47 |
No tracked changes.
ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge trial). Geocoding by SmartMonkey starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2,215 reviews) compared to Geocoding by SmartMonkey (4.0★ from 36 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Geocoding by SmartMonkey fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace. ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar has more onboarding documentation maturity (2,215 reviews vs 36), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Geocoding by SmartMonkey typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (36 reviews). ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (2,215 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Geocoding by SmartMonkey and ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Geocoding by SmartMonkey" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.