Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
The ultimate AI powered project planning tool that seamlessly integrates with Google™.
| gantterAi™ | Teamwork.com | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Turn talk into tasks with the Teamwork.com add-on for Gmail™.
| Metric | gantterAi™ | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 ★ | ★ 4.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.9k | 132 |
| Active installs | 6,157,956+ | 218,461+ |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Not available | Free of charge |
Based on the data on this page, Teamwork.com is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 4.2★ vs gantterAi™'s 3.9★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Teamwork.com offers a free tier (Free of charge) while gantterAi™ starts at Not available. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
gantterAi™ has the larger user base (1,859 reviews vs 132), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Teamwork.com's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Teamwork.com; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — gantterAi™'s 1,859-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Teamwork.com's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: gantterAi™ audit • Teamwork.com audit
| Keyword | gantterAi™ | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| chatbots | #32 | Not ranked |
| project | #37 | Not ranked |
Teamwork.com is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge). gantterAi™ starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Teamwork.com has the higher average rating (4.2★ from 132 reviews) compared to gantterAi™ (3.9★ from 1,859 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Teamwork.com holds the higher average rating (4.2★ vs 3.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. gantterAi™ has the deeper published review base (1,859 vs 132), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
gantterAi™ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,859 reviews). Teamwork.com typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (132 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. gantterAi™ and Teamwork.com both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Teamwork.com" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.