Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Easily manage Google Workspace licenses right from a Google Sheet™
| G License Manager | Tomba for Sheets™ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
✅Revolutionize business outreach with precise ✅email discovery, ✅verification, and ✅data enrichment in a single click✅.Email Extractor✅
| Metric | G License Manager | Tomba for Sheets™ |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | 5 | ★ 69 |
| Active installs | 1,106,637+ | 96,193+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge | Free of charge with paid features |
Based on the data on this page, G License Manager is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 5.0★ vs Tomba for Sheets™'s 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: G License Manager at Free of charge, Tomba for Sheets™ at Free of charge with paid features. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to G License Manager; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Tomba for Sheets™'s 69-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than G License Manager's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: G License Manager audit • Tomba for Sheets™ audit
| Keyword | G License Manager | Tomba for Sheets™ |
|---|---|---|
| ai agents | Not ranked | #7 |
| jotform | Not ranked | #12 |
| ai agent | Not ranked | #18 |
No tracked changes.
Both G License Manager and Tomba for Sheets™ offer paid plans only. G License Manager starts at Free of charge; Tomba for Sheets™ starts at Free of charge with paid features. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
G License Manager has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 5 reviews) compared to Tomba for Sheets™ (4.6★ from 69 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
G License Manager holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Tomba for Sheets™ has the deeper published review base (69 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
G License Manager typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). Tomba for Sheets™ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (69 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. G License Manager and Tomba for Sheets™ both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from G License Manager" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
