Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Flubaroo | Kami | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Flubaroo | Kami | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Flubaroo | Kami |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.6 ★ | 4.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2k | ★ 14k |
| Active installs | 43,082,764+ | 59,675,246+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge | Free of charge with paid features |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Featured placements | ★ 2 | 1 |
Flubaroo edges out Kami on rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: Flubaroo at Free of charge, Kami at Free of charge with paid features. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Kami has the larger user base (13,582 reviews vs 2,034), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Flubaroo's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Flubaroo; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Kami's 13,582-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Flubaroo's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Flubaroo audit • Kami audit
Both Flubaroo and Kami offer paid plans only. Flubaroo starts at Free of charge; Kami starts at Free of charge with paid features. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Flubaroo has the higher average rating (4.6★ from 2,034 reviews) compared to Kami (4.4★ from 13,582 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Flubaroo fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Kami is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace. Kami has more onboarding documentation maturity (13,582 reviews vs 2,034), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Flubaroo typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (2,034 reviews). Kami aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (13,582 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Flubaroo and Kami both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Flubaroo" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.