Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Editey | Sheet2Site | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Editey | Sheet2Site | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Editey | Sheet2Site |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 415 | 92 |
| Active installs | 1,047,428+ | 103,562+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Not available | Not available |
Based on the data on this page, Sheet2Site is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 4.8★ vs Editey's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Editey at Not available, Sheet2Site at Not available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Editey has the larger user base (415 reviews vs 92), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Sheet2Site's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Sheet2Site; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Editey's 415-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Sheet2Site's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Editey audit • Sheet2Site audit
| Keyword | Editey | Sheet2Site |
|---|---|---|
| chatbots | #64 | Not ranked |
| project | #66 | Not ranked |
Both Editey and Sheet2Site offer paid plans only. Editey starts at Not available; Sheet2Site starts at Not available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Sheet2Site has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 92 reviews) compared to Editey (4.1★ from 415 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Sheet2Site holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Editey has the deeper published review base (415 vs 92), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Editey typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (415 reviews). Sheet2Site typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (92 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Editey and Sheet2Site both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Sheet2Site" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.