Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
With the Dropbox add-on, compatible with Gmail™, you can instantly save attachments to Dropbox, share live file links, and attach Dropbox files directly into your email.
| Dropbox for Gmail™ | Table of contents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Dropbox for Gmail™ | Table of contents |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.0 ★ | 3.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 3.4k | 3.1k |
| Active installs | 2,055,876+ | 4,229,409+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free of charge | Not available |
Based on the data on this page, Dropbox for Gmail™ is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 4.0★ vs Table of contents's 3.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Dropbox for Gmail™ offers a free tier (Free of charge) while Table of contents starts at Not available. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Dropbox for Gmail™ has the larger user base (3,353 reviews vs 3,113), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Table of contents's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Dropbox for Gmail™; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Table of contents's 3,113-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Dropbox for Gmail™'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Dropbox for Gmail™ audit • Table of contents audit
Dropbox for Gmail™ is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge). Table of contents starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Dropbox for Gmail™ has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 3,353 reviews) compared to Table of contents (3.4★ from 3,113 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Dropbox for Gmail™ holds the higher average rating (4.0★ vs 3.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Dropbox for Gmail™ has the deeper published review base (3,353 vs 3,113), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Dropbox for Gmail™ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3,353 reviews). Table of contents typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3,113 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Dropbox for Gmail™ and Table of contents both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Table of contents" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.