Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
List path, direct links, image URLs, size, etc., of your Google Drive™ files on browser or Google Sheets™. Sort files by name, size, etc., Generate direct download links.
| Drive Explorer | ZIP Extractor | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Open ZIP, RAR, 7z, TAR, and password-protected archives from Google Drive™, Gmail™, or your computer. Fully private: ZIP file processing is done in your browser, not on our servers.
| Metric | Drive Explorer | ZIP Extractor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 521 | ★ 16k |
| Active installs | 1,018,901+ | 65,162,084+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge with paid features | Free of charge |
Drive Explorer edges out ZIP Extractor on rating (4.5★ vs 4.3★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Drive Explorer at Free of charge with paid features, ZIP Extractor at Free of charge. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
ZIP Extractor has the larger user base (16,449 reviews vs 521), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Drive Explorer's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Drive Explorer; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ZIP Extractor's 16,449-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Drive Explorer's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Drive Explorer audit • ZIP Extractor audit
No tracked changes.
Both Drive Explorer and ZIP Extractor offer paid plans only. Drive Explorer starts at Free of charge with paid features; ZIP Extractor starts at Free of charge. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Drive Explorer has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 521 reviews) compared to ZIP Extractor (4.3★ from 16,449 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Drive Explorer holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. ZIP Extractor has the deeper published review base (16,449 vs 521), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Drive Explorer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (521 reviews). ZIP Extractor typically suits established teams with steady usage based on its published review base (16,449 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Drive Explorer and ZIP Extractor both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Drive Explorer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.