Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Appends Google Form question responses to the bottom of selected Google Docs™ .
| Doc Appender | Skolsynk | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Doc Appender | Skolsynk |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 142 | 2 |
| Active installs | 32,926,612+ | 712,243+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Not available | Not available |
Based on the data on this page, Skolsynk is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 5.0★ vs Doc Appender's 3.9★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Doc Appender at Not available, Skolsynk at Not available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Doc Appender has the larger user base (142 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Skolsynk's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Skolsynk; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Doc Appender's 142-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Skolsynk's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Doc Appender audit • Skolsynk audit
Both Doc Appender and Skolsynk offer paid plans only. Doc Appender starts at Not available; Skolsynk starts at Not available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Skolsynk has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Doc Appender (3.9★ from 142 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Skolsynk holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Doc Appender has the deeper published review base (142 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Doc Appender typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (142 reviews). Skolsynk typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Doc Appender and Skolsynk both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Skolsynk" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
