Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Bulk copy folders and files (including subfolders) in Google Drive™, keep folder and files ownership.
| Copy folder in Google Drive ™ | ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Manage, comment and share contacts directly from Calendar to keep your team organized
| Metric | Copy folder in Google Drive ™ | ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.2 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 111 | ★ 2.2k |
| Active installs | 769,710+ | 250,540+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge with paid features | Free of charge trial |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs Copy folder in Google Drive ™'s 3.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Copy folder in Google Drive ™ at Free of charge with paid features, ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar at Free of charge trial. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar has the larger user base (2,215 reviews vs 111), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Copy folder in Google Drive ™'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Copy folder in Google Drive ™'s 111-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Copy folder in Google Drive ™ audit • ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar audit
| Keyword | Copy folder in Google Drive ™ | ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar |
|---|---|---|
| chatbots | Not ranked | #45 |
| project | Not ranked | #47 |
No tracked changes.
Both Copy folder in Google Drive ™ and ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar offer paid plans only. Copy folder in Google Drive ™ starts at Free of charge with paid features; ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar starts at Free of charge trial. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2,215 reviews) compared to Copy folder in Google Drive ™ (3.2★ from 111 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Copy folder in Google Drive ™ fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace. ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar has more onboarding documentation maturity (2,215 reviews vs 111), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Copy folder in Google Drive ™ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (111 reviews). ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (2,215 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Copy folder in Google Drive ™ and ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Copy folder in Google Drive ™" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.