Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Copy Down | Kami | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Copy Down | Kami | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Copy Down | Kami |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 ★ | ★ 4.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | 327 | ★ 14k |
| Active installs | 30,693,763+ | 59,675,246+ |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Not available | Free of charge with paid features |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Featured placements | 1 | 1 |
Kami edges out Copy Down on rating (4.4★ vs 4.1★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. On pricing, Kami offers a free tier (Free of charge with paid features) while Copy Down starts at Not available. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Kami has the larger user base (13,582 reviews vs 327), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Copy Down's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Kami; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Copy Down's 327-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Kami's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Copy Down audit • Kami audit
Kami is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge with paid features). Copy Down starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Kami has the higher average rating (4.4★ from 13,582 reviews) compared to Copy Down (4.1★ from 327 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Copy Down fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Kami is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace. Kami has more onboarding documentation maturity (13,582 reviews vs 327), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Copy Down typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (327 reviews). Kami aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (13,582 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Copy Down and Kami both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Copy Down" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.