Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Stop accepting Google Form responses automatically at a date and time
| Control Accepting Responses | ZIP Extractor | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Open ZIP, RAR, 7z, TAR, and password-protected archives from Google Drive™, Gmail™, or your computer. Fully private: ZIP file processing is done in your browser, not on our servers.
| Metric | Control Accepting Responses | ZIP Extractor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.3 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1.2k | ★ 16k |
| Active installs | 5,457,338+ | 65,225,981+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge | Free of charge |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Featured placements | — | 1 |
Control Accepting Responses and ZIP Extractor are evenly matched on rating (4.3★ vs 4.3★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: Control Accepting Responses at Free of charge, ZIP Extractor at Free of charge. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. ZIP Extractor has the larger user base (16,449 reviews vs 1,181), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Control Accepting Responses's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Control Accepting Responses audit • ZIP Extractor audit
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
Both Control Accepting Responses and ZIP Extractor offer paid plans only. Control Accepting Responses starts at Free of charge; ZIP Extractor starts at Free of charge. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Control Accepting Responses (4.3★, 1,181 reviews) and ZIP Extractor (4.3★, 16,449 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Control Accepting Responses fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; ZIP Extractor is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace. ZIP Extractor has more onboarding documentation maturity (16,449 reviews vs 1,181), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Control Accepting Responses typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1,181 reviews). ZIP Extractor aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (16,449 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Control Accepting Responses and ZIP Extractor both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Control Accepting Responses" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.