Control Accepting Responses vs Gestion en masa

Based on the data on this page, Gestion en masa is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 5.0★ vs Control Accepting Responses's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Control Accepting Responses at Free of charge, Gestion en masa at Free of charge trial. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Control Accepting Responses has the larger user base (1,180 reviews vs 8), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Gestion en masa's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Gestion en masa; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Control Accepting Responses's 1,180-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Gestion en masa's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Control Accepting Responses or Gestion en masa cheaper?

Both Control Accepting Responses and Gestion en masa offer paid plans only. Control Accepting Responses starts at Free of charge; Gestion en masa starts at Free of charge trial. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Control Accepting Responses or Gestion en masa?

Gestion en masa has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 8 reviews) compared to Control Accepting Responses (4.3★ from 1,180 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Control Accepting Responses or Gestion en masa?

Gestion en masa holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Control Accepting Responses or Gestion en masa?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Control Accepting Responses has the deeper published review base (1,180 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Google Workspace Marketplace admins?

Control Accepting Responses typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,180 reviews). Gestion en masa typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Control Accepting Responses and Gestion en masa?

Migration support varies by app and category. Control Accepting Responses and Gestion en masa both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Gestion en masa" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.