Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Manage, comment and share contacts directly from Calendar to keep your team organized
| ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar | Evernote for Google Gmail™ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Overcome inbox overload. Bring the best out of your email inbox into a distraction-free workspace.
| Metric | ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar | Evernote for Google Gmail™ |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 2.2k | 1k |
| Active installs | 250,540+ | 1,953,069+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge trial | Free of charge |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Featured placements | 1 | 1 |
Based on the data on this page, ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs Evernote for Google Gmail™'s 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar at Free of charge trial, Evernote for Google Gmail™ at Free of charge. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar has the larger user base (2,215 reviews vs 1,009), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Evernote for Google Gmail™'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Evernote for Google Gmail™'s 1,009-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar audit • Evernote for Google Gmail™ audit
| Keyword | ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar | Evernote for Google Gmail™ |
|---|---|---|
| project | #49 | Not ranked |
Both ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar and Evernote for Google Gmail™ offer paid plans only. ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar starts at Free of charge trial; Evernote for Google Gmail™ starts at Free of charge. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2,215 reviews) compared to Evernote for Google Gmail™ (4.2★ from 1,009 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Evernote for Google Gmail™ is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace. ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar has more onboarding documentation maturity (2,215 reviews vs 1,009), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (2,215 reviews). Evernote for Google Gmail™ aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (1,009 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ContactsFlow™ Shared Contacts for Calendar and Evernote for Google Gmail™ both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Evernote for Google Gmail™" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.