Canva vs QuillBot | Paraphrasing and Summarizing Tool

Canva and QuillBot | Paraphrasing and Summarizing Tool are evenly matched on rating (4.5★ vs 4.5★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

On pricing, Canva offers a free tier (Free of charge) while QuillBot | Paraphrasing and Summarizing Tool starts at Not available. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.

QuillBot | Paraphrasing and Summarizing Tool has the larger user base (1,278 reviews vs 403), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Canva's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Canva or QuillBot | Paraphrasing and Summarizing Tool cheaper?

Canva is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge). QuillBot | Paraphrasing and Summarizing Tool starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Canva or QuillBot | Paraphrasing and Summarizing Tool?

Canva (4.5★, 403 reviews) and QuillBot | Paraphrasing and Summarizing Tool (4.5★, 1,278 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose Canva or QuillBot | Paraphrasing and Summarizing Tool?

QuillBot | Paraphrasing and Summarizing Tool holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Canva or QuillBot | Paraphrasing and Summarizing Tool?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. QuillBot | Paraphrasing and Summarizing Tool has the deeper published review base (1,278 vs 403), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Google Workspace Marketplace admins?

Canva typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (403 reviews). QuillBot | Paraphrasing and Summarizing Tool typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,278 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.