Miro vs BeFunky Photo Editor

BeFunky Photo Editor and Miro are evenly matched on rating (4.2★ vs 4.3★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

On pricing, Miro offers a free tier (Free of charge) while BeFunky Photo Editor starts at Not available. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

BeFunky Photo Editor has the larger user base (4,082 reviews vs 148), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Miro's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is BeFunky Photo Editor or Miro cheaper?

Miro is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge). BeFunky Photo Editor starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, BeFunky Photo Editor or Miro?

BeFunky Photo Editor (4.2★, 4,082 reviews) and Miro (4.3★, 148 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose BeFunky Photo Editor or Miro?

Miro holds the higher average rating (4.3★ vs 4.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, BeFunky Photo Editor or Miro?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. BeFunky Photo Editor has the deeper published review base (4,082 vs 148), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Google Workspace Marketplace admins?

BeFunky Photo Editor typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4,082 reviews). Miro typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (148 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between BeFunky Photo Editor and Miro?

Migration support varies by app and category. BeFunky Photo Editor and Miro both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Miro" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.