Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Edit your photos. Create beautiful collages. Design stunning graphic design layouts.
| BeFunky Photo Editor | EML, MHT Viewer with Drive | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
This utility parses and displays EML(mail message), MHT files. Inline images are displayed both as attachments and in the HTML.
| Metric | BeFunky Photo Editor | EML, MHT Viewer with Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.2 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 4.1k | 513 |
| Active installs | 2,857,271+ | 1,580,461+ |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Not available | Free of charge |
BeFunky Photo Editor edges out EML, MHT Viewer with Drive on rating (4.2★ vs 4.0★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, EML, MHT Viewer with Drive offers a free tier (Free of charge) while BeFunky Photo Editor starts at Not available. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
BeFunky Photo Editor has the larger user base (4,082 reviews vs 513), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. EML, MHT Viewer with Drive's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to BeFunky Photo Editor; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — EML, MHT Viewer with Drive's 513-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than BeFunky Photo Editor's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: BeFunky Photo Editor audit • EML, MHT Viewer with Drive audit
| Keyword | BeFunky Photo Editor | EML, MHT Viewer with Drive |
|---|---|---|
| chatbots | #33 | Not ranked |
| project | #35 | Not ranked |
EML, MHT Viewer with Drive is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge). BeFunky Photo Editor starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
BeFunky Photo Editor has the higher average rating (4.2★ from 4,082 reviews) compared to EML, MHT Viewer with Drive (4.0★ from 513 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
BeFunky Photo Editor holds the higher average rating (4.2★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. BeFunky Photo Editor has the deeper published review base (4,082 vs 513), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
BeFunky Photo Editor typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4,082 reviews). EML, MHT Viewer with Drive typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (513 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. BeFunky Photo Editor and EML, MHT Viewer with Drive both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from EML, MHT Viewer with Drive" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.