Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Edit your photos. Create beautiful collages. Design stunning graphic design layouts.
| BeFunky Photo Editor | CapCut-Web | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
As a top video & image editor, CapCut is your creative stage. With CapCut's diverse text stickers, templates, and audio filters, you can craft high-quality videos and images easily.
| Metric | BeFunky Photo Editor | CapCut-Web |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 ★ | ★ 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 4.1k | 127 |
| Active installs | 2,857,271+ | 2,811,231+ |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Not available | Free of charge with paid features |
Based on the data on this page, CapCut-Web is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 4.5★ vs BeFunky Photo Editor's 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, CapCut-Web offers a free tier (Free of charge with paid features) while BeFunky Photo Editor starts at Not available. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
BeFunky Photo Editor has the larger user base (4,082 reviews vs 127), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. CapCut-Web's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to CapCut-Web; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — BeFunky Photo Editor's 4,082-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than CapCut-Web's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: BeFunky Photo Editor audit • CapCut-Web audit
| Keyword | BeFunky Photo Editor | CapCut-Web |
|---|---|---|
| chatbots | #33 | Not ranked |
| project | #35 | Not ranked |
CapCut-Web is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge with paid features). BeFunky Photo Editor starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
CapCut-Web has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 127 reviews) compared to BeFunky Photo Editor (4.2★ from 4,082 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
CapCut-Web holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. BeFunky Photo Editor has the deeper published review base (4,082 vs 127), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
BeFunky Photo Editor typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4,082 reviews). CapCut-Web typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (127 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. BeFunky Photo Editor and CapCut-Web both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CapCut-Web" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
