Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Automated, Secure Google Workspace™ Backup & Recovery for Enterprise Business Gmail™ | Calendar™ | Contacts™ | Drive™ | Shared Drives™
| Backupify for Google Workspace™ | HelloFax | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Backupify for Google Workspace™ | HelloFax |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.2 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 89 | ★ 1.9k |
| Active installs | 8,685,260+ | 472,539+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Paid | Not available |
Backupify for Google Workspace™ edges out HelloFax on rating (4.2★ vs 4.0★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Backupify for Google Workspace™ at Paid, HelloFax at Not available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
HelloFax has the larger user base (1,949 reviews vs 89), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Backupify for Google Workspace™'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Backupify for Google Workspace™; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — HelloFax's 1,949-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Backupify for Google Workspace™'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Backupify for Google Workspace™ audit • HelloFax audit
Both Backupify for Google Workspace™ and HelloFax offer paid plans only. Backupify for Google Workspace™ starts at Paid; HelloFax starts at Not available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Backupify for Google Workspace™ has the higher average rating (4.2★ from 89 reviews) compared to HelloFax (4.0★ from 1,949 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Backupify for Google Workspace™ holds the higher average rating (4.2★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. HelloFax has the deeper published review base (1,949 vs 89), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Backupify for Google Workspace™ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (89 reviews). HelloFax typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,949 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Backupify for Google Workspace™ and HelloFax both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Backupify for Google Workspace™" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.