Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Quickly convert your PDFs, Docs, and Slides to Google Forms™.
| Automagical Forms | Mail Tracker for Gmail™ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Track your emails and know when they are opened. Mail tracker for mobile & desktop
| Metric | Automagical Forms | Mail Tracker for Gmail™ |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 ★ | ★ 4.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 3.1k | 2.9k |
| Active installs | 33,961,334+ | 997,049+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge with paid features | Free of charge with paid features |
Mail Tracker for Gmail™ edges out Automagical Forms on rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Automagical Forms at Free of charge with paid features, Mail Tracker for Gmail™ at Free of charge with paid features. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Automagical Forms has the larger user base (3,075 reviews vs 2,906), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Mail Tracker for Gmail™'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Mail Tracker for Gmail™; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Automagical Forms's 3,075-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Mail Tracker for Gmail™'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Automagical Forms audit • Mail Tracker for Gmail™ audit
| Keyword | Automagical Forms | Mail Tracker for Gmail™ |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #2 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Both Automagical Forms and Mail Tracker for Gmail™ offer paid plans only. Automagical Forms starts at Free of charge with paid features; Mail Tracker for Gmail™ starts at Free of charge with paid features. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Mail Tracker for Gmail™ has the higher average rating (4.6★ from 2,906 reviews) compared to Automagical Forms (4.4★ from 3,075 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Mail Tracker for Gmail™ holds the higher average rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Automagical Forms has the deeper published review base (3,075 vs 2,906), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Automagical Forms typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3,075 reviews). Mail Tracker for Gmail™ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2,906 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Automagical Forms and Mail Tracker for Gmail™ both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Mail Tracker for Gmail™" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.