Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
This add-on lets you instantly convert every math equation in your document into beautiful latex images!
| Auto-LaTeX Equations | eBook Viewer and Converter | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
eBook(azw3, fb2, lit, lrf, mobi, pdb), CHM file viewer & converter with Google Drive. Convert text file to ePub format.
| Metric | Auto-LaTeX Equations | eBook Viewer and Converter |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 3.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.8k | 255 |
| Active installs | 33,312,277+ | 246,326+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge | Free of charge |
Based on the data on this page, Auto-LaTeX Equations is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 4.5★ vs eBook Viewer and Converter's 3.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Auto-LaTeX Equations at Free of charge, eBook Viewer and Converter at Free of charge. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Auto-LaTeX Equations has the larger user base (1,822 reviews vs 255), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. eBook Viewer and Converter's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Auto-LaTeX Equations; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — eBook Viewer and Converter's 255-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Auto-LaTeX Equations's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Auto-LaTeX Equations audit • eBook Viewer and Converter audit
Both Auto-LaTeX Equations and eBook Viewer and Converter offer paid plans only. Auto-LaTeX Equations starts at Free of charge; eBook Viewer and Converter starts at Free of charge. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Auto-LaTeX Equations has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 1,822 reviews) compared to eBook Viewer and Converter (3.1★ from 255 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Auto-LaTeX Equations holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 3.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Auto-LaTeX Equations has the deeper published review base (1,822 vs 255), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Auto-LaTeX Equations typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,822 reviews). eBook Viewer and Converter typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (255 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Auto-LaTeX Equations and eBook Viewer and Converter both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from eBook Viewer and Converter" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
