Autocrat vs Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on

Autocrat and Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on are evenly matched on rating (4.3★ vs 4.3★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

Pricing entry tiers: Autocrat at Not available, Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on at Not available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Autocrat has the larger user base (6,204 reviews vs 1,931), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Autocrat or Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on cheaper?

Both Autocrat and Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on offer paid plans only. Autocrat starts at Not available; Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on starts at Not available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Autocrat or Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on?

Autocrat (4.3★, 6,204 reviews) and Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on (4.3★, 1,931 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose Autocrat or Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on?

Autocrat holds the higher average rating (4.3★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Autocrat or Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Autocrat has the deeper published review base (6,204 vs 1,931), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Google Workspace Marketplace admins?

Autocrat typically suits established teams with steady usage based on its published review base (6,204 reviews). Pear Deck for Google Slides Add-on typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,931 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.