Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Autocrat | Kami | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Autocrat | Kami | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Autocrat | Kami |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 ★ | ★ 4.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | 6.1k | ★ 14k |
| Active installs | 80,835,860+ | 59,483,527+ |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Not available | Free of charge with paid features |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Featured placements | 1 | 1 |
Autocrat and Kami are evenly matched on rating (4.3★ vs 4.4★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. On pricing, Kami offers a free tier (Free of charge with paid features) while Autocrat starts at Not available. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Kami has the larger user base (13,587 reviews vs 6,149), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Autocrat's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Autocrat audit • Kami audit
Kami is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge with paid features). Autocrat starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Autocrat (4.3★, 6,149 reviews) and Kami (4.4★, 13,587 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Autocrat fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Kami is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace marketplace. Kami has more onboarding documentation maturity (13,587 reviews vs 6,149), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Autocrat typically suits established stores with steady traffic based on its review-base composition (6,149 reviews). Kami aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (13,587 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Autocrat and Kami both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Autocrat" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.