Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Connect and import data from any API to Google Sheets™
| API Connector | Together Mentoring | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Together Mentoring App's Gsuite integration for SSO + Calendar Integration.
| Metric | API Connector | Together Mentoring |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 299 | 1 |
| Active installs | 1,051,299+ | 560,031+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free of charge with paid features | Not available |
Based on the data on this page, Together Mentoring is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 5.0★ vs API Connector's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, API Connector offers a free tier (Free of charge with paid features) while Together Mentoring starts at Not available. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
API Connector has the larger user base (299 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Together Mentoring's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Together Mentoring; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — API Connector's 299-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Together Mentoring's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: API Connector audit • Together Mentoring audit
API Connector is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge with paid features). Together Mentoring starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Together Mentoring has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to API Connector (4.1★ from 299 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Together Mentoring holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. API Connector has the deeper published review base (299 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
API Connector typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (299 reviews). Together Mentoring typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. API Connector and Together Mentoring both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Together Mentoring" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
