Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Review today’s tasks right from your Gmail™. Easily add action-items directly from your email threads.
| Any.do for Gmail™ | gantterAi™ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
The ultimate AI powered project planning tool that seamlessly integrates with Google™.
| Metric | Any.do for Gmail™ | gantterAi™ |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.6 ★ | ★ 3.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 192 | ★ 1.9k |
| Active installs | 441,209+ | 6,157,956+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free of charge | Not available |
gantterAi™ edges out Any.do for Gmail™ on rating (3.9★ vs 3.6★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Any.do for Gmail™ offers a free tier (Free of charge) while gantterAi™ starts at Not available. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
gantterAi™ has the larger user base (1,859 reviews vs 192), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Any.do for Gmail™'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to gantterAi™; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Any.do for Gmail™'s 192-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than gantterAi™'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Any.do for Gmail™ audit • gantterAi™ audit
| Keyword | Any.do for Gmail™ | gantterAi™ |
|---|---|---|
| chatbots | Not ranked | #32 |
| project | Not ranked | #37 |
Any.do for Gmail™ is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge). gantterAi™ starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
gantterAi™ has the higher average rating (3.9★ from 1,859 reviews) compared to Any.do for Gmail™ (3.6★ from 192 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
gantterAi™ holds the higher average rating (3.9★ vs 3.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. gantterAi™ has the deeper published review base (1,859 vs 192), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Any.do for Gmail™ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (192 reviews). gantterAi™ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,859 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Any.do for Gmail™ and gantterAi™ both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Any.do for Gmail™" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.