Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Create custom apps for all your business needs with very little code. Build once on web and use them across mobile platforms with targeted functionality.
| Anteater | Zoho Creator | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Anteater | Zoho Creator |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | 8 | ★ 94 |
| Active installs | 643+ | 1,529,293+ |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Not available | Free of charge |
Based on the data on this page, Anteater is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 5.0★ vs Zoho Creator's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Zoho Creator offers a free tier (Free of charge) while Anteater starts at Not available. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Anteater; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Zoho Creator's 94-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Anteater's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Anteater audit • Zoho Creator audit
Zoho Creator is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge). Anteater starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Anteater has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 8 reviews) compared to Zoho Creator (4.1★ from 94 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Anteater holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Zoho Creator has the deeper published review base (94 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Anteater typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). Zoho Creator typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (94 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Anteater and Zoho Creator both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Anteater" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
