Anteater vs Striven For Gmail

Based on the data on this page, Anteater is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 5.0★ vs Striven For Gmail's 4.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Anteater at Not available, Striven For Gmail at Not available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Anteater; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Striven For Gmail's 68-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Anteater's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Anteater or Striven For Gmail cheaper?

Both Anteater and Striven For Gmail offer paid plans only. Anteater starts at Not available; Striven For Gmail starts at Not available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Anteater or Striven For Gmail?

Anteater has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 8 reviews) compared to Striven For Gmail (4.7★ from 68 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Anteater or Striven For Gmail?

Anteater holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Anteater or Striven For Gmail?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Striven For Gmail has the deeper published review base (68 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Google Workspace Marketplace admins?

Anteater typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). Striven For Gmail typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (68 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Anteater and Striven For Gmail?

Migration support varies by app and category. Anteater and Striven For Gmail both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Anteater" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.